The Latest

Like every year in last the23 years of Oikos’ existence we spent three days evaluating our operations in 2011. Not only financial but also project activities were discussed which gave us an understanding for our plan in 2012.

  • We have been weak in social networking especially in projects we are implementing. Social networks not only digital must and will be used to keep up public discussions and understand needs of different stakeholders.
  • We need to be more active in developing project management and analytical tools and methods and in using them. Clear project tools are needed in order to make project management more efficient and also to be able to develop and maintain social dialogue and support clients in their decision making.
  • We have more space in developing our cooperation with project partners. Coordination and open collaboration with project partners gives way to innovation and efficiency and we will keep on supporting it.
  • We have been lazy at cooperation among us internally. Internal cooperation is a key for future open and successful social integration.

But we have also been good at some issues.

  • We have started strong cooperation with former competitors and togethere we established ROBBA Consortium. We like it. We are happy to be a part of it.
  • Our operations in Croatia and Serbia have started to pick up activities and finished  2011 business year successfully. We will be hiring there soon. And we like it.
  • We won some nice and important projects and are working with our clients to bring project result with the aim of addressing relevant needs of their target groups. We will do so in the future, too.

Our planning for 2012 is over. We love our projects so let’s enjoy now.

 

Identify Key City stakeholders

On December 12, 2011, in Smart news from others, by Oikos
0

Identify Key City Stakeholders There is a long list of potential stakeholders for the plan within a city context, for example:• The Local Authority • Higher Education Establishments • Private Business • NHS Establishments• Local communityIdentifying which of the above will be key to your project is crucial at an early stage so that you can plan their involvement and take account of their views, knowledge and experience.It is also important to clearly define the physical boundaries of the programme:During their city-wide carbon reduction plan Bristol settled on the city limits as the limit, but this could equally be a ring road. Manchester included the 10 local authorities that make up the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities AGMA.This decision defines the scope of the work required and it is important to establish this from the outset.The stakeholder mapping tool is designed to help you identify the key stakeholders and begin to plan their involvement in the process. In practice, you will probably build an understanding of the importance and influence of individual stakeholders iteratively throughout the life of the programme. For this reason it is important to revisit periodically your initial impressions and update them with new information.Bristol held a city wide kick off meeting to which a broad range of stakeholder were invited. They found this useful in gauging interest and generating ideas.

via Identify Key City stakeholders.

 

Mapping the mood: average negative blue map, top and positive red map, bottom feelings for each country Image: Science/AAASTwitter users who post messages such as “Yay, its the weekend!” might not be engaged in the most stimulating of conversations. But these kinds of tweets can provide sociologists with a map of peoples moods around the world.Scott Golder and Michael Macy at Cornell University in New York gathered 509 million tweets from 2.4 million users in 84 different countries. They and analysed the messages using linguistic software that looks for positive or negative emotions within the text. They found that people tend to wake up in a good mood, which deteriorates as the day wears on. People tend to also be happier at the weekend, when the morning good-mood peak tends to be delayed by two hours, suggesting a lie-in. People are less positive during the winter, when the hours of daylight are shorter.None of these results are particularly surprising, but Golder and Macy suggest that using global tweets allows them to confirm previous studies that only looked at small samples of American undergraduates who were not necessarily representative of the wider world. Traditional studies also require participants to recall their past emotions, whereas tweets can be gathered in real time.The Twitter approach has also been tried before, but this is the first time researchers have gathered data on a global scale. While peoples moods seem to be consistent across countries and cultures, Golder and Macy did identify a shift in weekend moods in the United Arab Emirates, where the work week runs from Sunday to Thursday. Their results were published today in the journal Science.

via One Per Cent: Twitter mood map reveals the worlds emotions.

 

Monitoring and evaluation of any policy is based on belief that citizens or taxpayers must get more for less which can only be achieved through relevant policies and their effective implementation. European Commission started discussion on Monitoring and Evaluation for Common Agricultural Policy post 2013 which will lead to preparation of regulations and other implementing legislative. But more important than legislation proper and transparent policy preparation is which must be supported with strong evaluation. Both planning and evaluation are framed with culture and culture is basically responsible for citizens and taxpayers happiness.

Monitoring and Evaluation of the CAP post 2013

Monitoring and Evaluation of the CAP post 2013

Europe needs to focus its development plans to smaller number of objectives with clear performance indicators and to fewer measures with clear understanding of targets to be achieved. This may lead to less common objectives and indicators which will show performance of the policy on European level while member states should be able to design their own specific objectives and plans. This may lead to more flexible evaluation procedures at the program level while better presentation of achieved on the European level. This will not hurt evaluation quality but may only simplify procedures being too costly and complicated at the moment.

Fever indicators will not hurt the quality of evaluation but will lead to better innovation and especially to clearer focus of evaluators and implementing authorities. Selecting of indicators on the other hand needs to be carefully done in the whole process of programing and evaluation in order to represent performance of the program.

Content of evaluations and timing do not need to be clearly defined in early stages of policy preparation. Content of evaluations needs to be designed later in end of the planning and in implementing phases of the program. This will improve quality of evaluations being more focused to thematic and territorial impact of interventions while still having guiding and monitoring purposes. More intensity needs to be focused to scoping as a first stage of evaluation which should be led by program objectives and needs of each Member state in order to achieve its competitiveness.

Agricultural policy achieved a great lesson by introducing common evaluation guidelines but this system need to be further developed especially by developing clear understanding what are the European Union level evaluation needs and what can must be used and managed at the Member state level. Common monitoring and evaluation framework needs to become a guideline in a greater deal than regulation leading towards clear definition of our common indicators and having more flexibility on member state level to be able to use results of evaluation for planning and implementation purposes.

 

This year it is the 10th anniversary of the adoption of the SEA Directive in the European Union and the entry into force of the SEA Protocol to the Espoo Convention. That makes this years’ “Special Conference on Strategic Environmental Assessment – International Association of Impact Assessment SEA Prague II 2011” a good opportunity to reflect on the overall performance of SEA systems, introduce the latest innovations in our profession and outline the next decade of environmental assessments.

Organizers formed core questions of interest that include the following:
• What needs to be done to accelerate environmental integration into strategic level decision making through the application of SEA? How can we take advantage and promote existing SEA good practice worldwide and influence the identification and choice of sustainable development alternatives and options?
• Does SEA address the tougher issues and threats of cumulative and large scale environmental effects such as the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services, resource depletion and climate change? Does SEA facilitate a transition to a green economy and effectively addresses impacts on human wellbeing? How can SEA better address these concerns?
• Does SEA facilitate constructive public participation and stakeholder dialogue? How can the SEA process be made more interactive? What value is added, e.g., by mediated discussion among key stakeholders and the search for development options that are in their mutual interest?

Oikos is actively participating at the Special Conference on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Mojca Hrabar is a member of International Advisory Committee and is involved in organisation of conference themes “Sector-Specific SEA: Are We Getting it Right?” and “SEA and EU Cohesion Policy: Coming Together or Still Far Apart?”. Matjaž Harmel is involved in conference session “Transposition and Implementation Issues for Spatial Planning” with paper presentation “The Case of SEA Process in Ljubljana Spatial Plans”. Klemen Strmšnik is presenting a poster that deals with lessons learned in the process of “SEA of “3rd Development Axis” in Slovenia”.

All details on Special Conference on Strategic Environmental Assessment and contributes of Oikos can be found on official web site of IAIA.

Author: Klemen Strmšnik

 

Oikos Summer Camp Serbia 2011

On August 24, 2011, in This is who we are, by Oikos
0

Oikos is organizing an annual internal training camp which is to be held in Serbia this year. Next week you will be able to meet us in Majdanpek in Eastern Serbia and in several other cities and municipalities around there (Zaječar, Golubac, Negotin, Kladovo, Skobanja and several others).

Team work Oikos

Team work Oikos

This year internal training of Oikos’s employees from Serbia, Croatia, Montenegro and Slovenia is focused to evaluation techniques; relevance and feasibility evaluation of projects beeing developed by Serbian local communities. Results of the training are evaluation of the relevance of projects proposed by municipalities with recommendations which will lead to better and more quality project development by municipalities involved in the GIZ training on PCM in Serbia. In the time of the training more than 14 projects will be evaluated by understanding needs and possibilities of each of the municipality involved and understanding the relevance of each project proposed.

The evaluation activities are being prepared by our younger employees in order to develop a new generation of project team members and team leaders. Evaluation itself will be implemented in moderated process together with municipalities which will help rising evaluation culture and understanding of the evaluation internaly in Oikos and in Serbia. This will not only help rising a quality of projects but also help regional growth in Serbia and its lagging behind regions.  The regional growth is an overall objective all operations of the national government, regional agents and local communities.

We are happy to be able to cooperate with municipalities and administration in Serbia and will be happy to share results of evaluations with anyone interested. More information can also be obtained by the GIZ Serbia or directly from @JurijKobal the team leader of the GIZ PCM training in Danube region.

 

Imagine other people paying you to use your things when you don’t need them. That’s the genius of collaborative consumption.

You might own some tools that you never use, or perhaps you have a backyard that you just don’t have the time to do anything interesting with. Until recently, those pieces of property mostly served as nagging reminders that you didn’t have enough time to do everything you wanted to do. Today, they can look like revenue streams, not wastes of money.

Ideas about ownership of property are slowly starting to change in this country. The success of Zip Car and of bike sharing programs in a few major cities are the vanguard of a host of different “collaborative consumption” services and businesses that allow people to monetize their own unused resources, or to find ways to get goods and services without purchasing them. This infographic shows some of the stuff that might be lying around your house that are just profits waiting to happen — and all the start-ups trying to help you along:

Collaborative Home

Collaborative Home

This infographic was made by the venture fund Collaborative—which invests in collaborative consumption businesses—and the Startup America Partnership in order to help illustrate the economic benefits of this idea. (Full disclosure: I used to work with the founder of Collaborative.)

Your house, it turns out, is full of things that could be making you some cash. Your car can be shared with your neighbors via RelayRides. Your driveway itself can be rented out as a parking spot through Park At My House. Your tools, video games, sports equipment, even clothes, are all monetizeable. How much can you get?

That’s right, the average New York-based user of Airbnb (a site which lets users rent out their house like a hotel) makes $21,000 annually. That’s a nice supplement to any income. You can also make $200 a month just by renting your video games out. And you thought that was a useless habit. Even if all you have is time, you can monetize that, too.

via Infographic: The Collaborative Home – Collaborative Consumption Blog Posts.

 

The Commission for the Prevention of Corruption published latest data onbusiness relations of Slovenian companies with public authorities and bodies who are responsible to act under the Public Procurement Law in Slovenia.

Oikos successfully disbursed its businesses operations from state budget to other clients from companies, international financial institutions to international donors and others. In 2010 we balanced the contracts with public authorities and bodies to half of our annual turn over from almost 70% two years ago.

More data can be found at the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption web site under our data sheet.

 

On the 25th July 2011 the draft National Planning Policy Framework was published by Government. After the release of the Natural Environment White Paper in June this year conservation organisations have been highly anticipating the publication of the Framework, which represents the next step in terms of implementing the declarations of the White Paper.

The document, which integrates the Government’s economic, environmental and social planning policies for England, was issued alongside a statement from the Environment Secretary, Caroline Spelman, who said “It will give local communities the power to protect green spaces that mean so much to them, while still giving the highest protection to our treasured landscapes such as national parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. It will also ensure that development needed to grow the economy is carried out in a sustainable way.”

The Government’s objective as stated in the Framework is that planning should help to deliver a healthy natural environment for the benefit of everyone and safe places which promote wellbeing. To achieve this objective, the document states that the planning system should aim to conserve and enhance the natural and local environment by protecting valued landscapes, minimise impacts on biodiversity and provide net gains where possible. The report also makes the statement that planning permission should be refused if significant harm resulting from a development cannot be avoided, adequately mitigated, or as a last resort, compensated for.

The Framework goes on to support the Lawton Review and the White Paper with its goals to minimise impacts on biodiversity by stating that planning policy should take into account the need to plan for biodiversity at a landscape-scale as well as identify and map components of the local ecological networks, including international, national and local sites. In line with EU targets the Framework states that planning will promote the preservation, restoration and re-creation of priority habitats, ecological networks and the recovery of priority species populations.

In terms of climate change the Government’s objective is that planning should fully support the transition to a low carbon economy in a changing climate, taking full account of flood risk and coastal change. To achieve this objective, the planning system should aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, support energy efficiency improvements to existing buildings, deliver renewable and low-carbon energy infrastructure and provide resilience to impacts arising from climate change.

The Planning Framework is now open for consultation until the 17th of October 2011 and followed by a series of events taking place across the UK. Read the full document here.

via UK Proposes National Planning Policy Framework | Sustainable Cities Collective.

 

What are the links between business and development? And what is the business role and opportunity in addressing sustainability challenges of developing countries and emerging economies?As an engine of growth and development, and to underpin its license to innovate, operate and grow, business has a critical role to play in accelerating progress towards development.Companies can most notably develop inclusive business ventures, that is, sustainable business solutions that expand access to goods, services, and livelihood opportunities for low-income communities in commercially viable ways. The notion of inclusive business calls for additional focus and innovation in the way companies do business. It involves creating new forms of employment, new markets, and affordable products and services. This spurs economic growth and encourages entrepreneurship.This article highlights the concept of inclusive business in the current global context, provides a few examples of its application in practice, highlights the foundations for its success, and briefly presents an interactive tool, the “Inclusive Business Challenge”. The latter, designed by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, aims at helping companies and stakeholders identify and implement inclusive business in practice.

via Inclusive business for sustainable livelihoods.